12/14/2023 0 Comments Star trek beyond target![]() ![]() However, today the service is down to just two: the 2009 Star Trek film and 2013’s Star Trek Into Darkness. By September of this year, all but Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan and Star Trek Beyond were still available. ![]() But over the last year, movies came and went from the service, sometimes appearing on other streaming services and sometimes not. Last November, the Paramount+ streaming service in the USA had finally become home to all thirteen Star Trek feature films. Paramount+ home to a couple of Star Trek movies And this month saw the biggest exodus in over a year. But Paramount and friends need to realize that Star Trek is never going to be a Guardians of the Galaxy-level success and plan accordingly.Paramount+ promotes itself as the home of Star Trek television, touting “every series, every episode,” but it can’t say the same when it comes to the Star Trek feature films which come and go with regularity. There is value in that over the long run. Star Trek Beyond was what its fans wanted it to be. The thing that made it most appealing to the fans, that it played like a smaller-scale 50th-anniversary homage to the spirit and tone of the original show, was the thing that arguably doomed it in terms of blockbuster success. Star Trek Beyond faltered because it cost too much, far too much, to just be seen (and play) as a quality middle-of-the-road Star Trek movie. But it won’t, because it has had every chance to do so without success. That hope, that this time a Star Trek movie will go nuts overseas, is what keeps the franchise alive and keeps those budgets so bloody high. Star Trek Beyond earned $183m overseas, which coupled with its $158m domestic cume gave it a $340m gross on a $185m budget. Star Trek into Darkness went out with a 3D conversion and earned a series high of $238m overseas for a $467m worldwide total on a $190m budget. The reboot earned a whopping $256 million domestic but just $127m overseas for a $385m worldwide total on a $150m budget. theaters.īut Star Trek has never been an overseas player. Spectre made so much overseas ($680m) that it would have been the second-biggest 007 film ever even if it had never played in U.S. Now that wasn’t an issue because Sony, MGM and friends knew they could bank on overseas muscle.Īnd, sure enough, Spectre made $880 million worldwide, which is one of the very biggest “non-fantasy” action movies ever behind Furious 7, Skyfall and (if you want to count them) The Dark Knight and The Dark Knight Rises. No.Īt $200 million domestic, Spectre was the second-biggest domestic grosser but 14 th out of 25 James Bond movies (yes, counting Never Say Never Again) in terms of inflation. But six of the bottom ten 007 films are Roger Moore movies along with two Timothy Dalton entries, On Her Majesty’s Secret Service and series starter Dr. I would argue that The Spy Who Loved Me is perhaps the definitive 007 film. Moore may be a defining Bond for a generation of moviegoers. So, it shouldn’t have been surprising when it ended up just above the various lower-grossing Roger Moore entries in terms of “ tickets sold.” The 25 th 007 film pitched itself as an ode to the Roger Moore era James Bond movies (with late Sean Connery-era Blofeld tossed in for good measure). In that sense, it wasn’t that different from the domestic performance of Sony’s Spectre this time last year. Point being, it was a middle-of-the-road Star Trek, meant to play like the opposite of a “super-duper-important-you-must-see-this-in-a-theater!” blockbuster. That is not a slam, as my favorite of the bunch ( Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country) sits in fourth-to-last place ahead of Star Trek Insurrection (another glorified television episode playing out on the big screen) and the justly maligned Star Trek V: The Final Frontier and Star Trek: Nemesis. While that’s the third-biggest domestic gross for a Star Trek movie, it was eighth out of 13 Star Trek feature films when adjusted for inflation. That was well below the $256m of Star Trek in 2009 and the $228m of Star Trek into Darkness in 2013. And to casual moviegoers, it had little to sell beyond “Hey, it’s another one of those newfangled Star Trek movies!”Īs such, even with mostly positive reviews, the film earned $158 million in North American theaters. ![]() It was, regardless of where it fits on your “best/worst Star Trek movies” list, an explicitly middle-of-the-road Star Trek film. It presented itself as “just another Star Trek movie,” in an era filled with big-budget sci-fi blockbusters, with less to entice casual moviegoers to make another theatrical go-around. Yet, part of the reason that Star Trek Beyond didn’t quite match its predecessors at the domestic box office was because of its comparative ordinariness. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |